Sap america inc versata software

With a global presence from north america to europe and asia, versata software, inc. The case proceeded to trial, and a jury found infringement and awarded damages. Administrative patent judges administrative patent judge. Law 360 highlights aza in versata patent suit verdict. United states court of appeals for the federal circuit. Circuit judges newman, plager, and hughes opinion by circuit judge plager. Get software and technology solutions from sap, the leader in business applications. After a jury verdict of infringement with an award of damages in favor of versata software, inc. The views expressed in this document are solely the views of the author and not martindalehubbell.

Versata invests capital and operational excellence to revitalize worldclass software and technology companies for sustainable success. February 22, 2008 privately held versata enterprises, inc. During the first trial, versatas expert presented evidence that saps software used hierarchical pricing. Updates with company comment starting in third paragraph.

On april 20, 2007, versata along with related companies versata software, inc. By michael borella section 18 of the leahysmith america invents act. Patent and trademark offices patent trial and appeal. Sap ariba recommends a fivepart strategy to effectively and efficiently respond to global supply chain disruption, with special offers, software, and services for supplier discovery, supplier risk management. Versata argues that its claims recite a specific approach to determining the price of a product on a computer, using hierarchies so as to enable the. Of note, sap did not appeal the district courts claim construction, and the validity of the 350 patent was not an issue on appeal. Federal circuit affirms lost profits and royalty award finding defendants raised questions of admissibility of plaintiff expert testimony in the improper context because these are daubert. District court, eastern district of texas marshall.

Announced the acquisition of nuvo network management inc. Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case versata software, inc. Of note, sap did not appeal the district courts claim. Versata development group, inc ptab invalidates claims in its first transitional program for covered business method patents but not because of the prior art june 19, 20.

Letter of january 15, 2014, from counsel for petitioners received. A federal jury in texas found friday that sap america inc. Nuvo was a canadianbased managed service providersoftware provider. Federal circuit upholds mckool smiths judgment for versata. Versata data development group, ptab case cbm201200001, presents many. Versatas expert did not alter or modify saps code in order to achieve the claimed functionality. On april 20, 2007, versata, along with versata software, inc. Rather, he followed saps own directions on how to implement pricing functionality in its. Versata is the first appellate decision of a covered business method cbm. The appeals have been fully briefed and are currently pending. Of note, sap did not appeal the district courtsclaimconstruction,and thevalidityofthe350patent was not an. In april 2007, versata sued sap for infringement of u.